I have nothing to complain about the visual design. It is easy to look at and I like the simple coloring. I am wondering if we could make our infographic as good like this.
The text shows limited information. I think it’s okay and helpful for easy understanding as far as it is well organized. Also, it contains a lot of numbers throughout. Basically, showing numbers makes it convincing and I found many of them astonishing and very interesting.
However, what is most disappointing in this infographic is the unclearness of the sources. It has long list of sources at the bottom but it doesn’t show which is for which information.
My part is sections 10 to 12. The number of users of Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube in section 11 is not difficult to check out, even though it must be changing all the time and it would be better to add the date. Section 10 gives percentages of what people are using the mobile internet for. I am curious who and how this research was conducted but couldn’t check the original site. The same applies to the calculation of section 12. The small font list itself is hard to look at and not helpful. Must I go through this list one by one if I want to check something?
I guess they did a thorough research and arranged it nicely, but unclearness of the source information ruined it somewhat.